|
Chapter 3 - News about a disappearance. The first 72 hours, pages 36 -74
- GA is informed about the case around midnight of the night of the 3rd. (Before he gets home he confirms that the police have already alerted the Faro Airport police authorities as well as those at the Guadiana River on the Spanish border.)
- the response team that is on duty is informed, goes to Luz to take care of the situation, photographs the scene, but fails to take pictures of what they really saw, for example there are no persons on the photos but the place was full of people
- the twins' cots are empty on the photos, without bedsheets or covers - nothing at all except for the bare cots - but the officers report that the twins were sleeping in the cots
- police procedures should be revised, as there are no guidelines
- the children were alone in the apt being checked every 30, or every 15, minutes depending on the different versions of the group
- Kate's mother gave the alarm, immediately assuming an abduction.
From page 39:
It is urgent to know who this couple is, as well as their friends, what do they do, what problems do they have in the UK, have they ever mistreated their children, has a neighbor, family, friend or anyone else noted any inappropriate behaviour? What is their profession? Full time? Has anyone suffered depression? Is the marriage relationship healthy? Are they involved in any serious litigation? Does anyone hold a grudge against them? Why?...
These questions were delivered to the UK-Portuguese police liaison [on 4 May] who GA has worked with for years, Glen Power, asking him to forward the request, which the team considered "essential to the investigation" and waited for the response.
====
4 May ===== - at 9 a.m GA arrives at the CID in Portimão and meets with Chief Inspector Tavares de ALmeida (it's supposed to be the first day of his holidays) to check on what has already been done and what needs to be done next; interpol already contacted, all Portuguese police forces are alerted; initial searches by locals and GNR done that night, to be continued/enlarged
- apt to be fully inspected, even though the arriving officers said the apt was full of people when they arrived and most likely contaminated
- it must be considered if the contamination was conscious or an accident
- searches include garbage bins and sewers; parents/friends must be formally interviewed (these first are almost always the most important), employees, nannies, other tourists; must ask English authorities if any of those guests have any criminal background; CCTV collected from all hotels, farmacies, markets, banks, gas stations, etc.
- Spanish border police are asked to watch ports to Morocco, Tarifa, Algeciras, via their CCTV; maritime police to collect any Algarve port data and do coastline searches
- crisis room is set up
- fotos from the group and other tourists are necessary. the group deliver them but they have no fotos, unfortunately, of that night; at least, none were delivered by the McCanns nor their friends
- apartment has NO signs of a break in, as opposed to what the parents say and what "Sky News" reports
- still all breakins in the area are reviewed, as ridiculous as it would be for a robber to take a child with them
- report must be filed with the Public Ministry... but what to call it? decision is made to record as an "Abduction??" with two question marks to indicate that there are doubts about this theory. (you can see this first form with the "??" in the process files)
- GA reads the "first arrival" report. all hypotheses are open: woke and wandered, accident/eventual death/hidden cadaver, bodily injuries resulting in death, negligent or intentional homicide, vingenace, kidnap for eventual ransom, sexual pedator, robber who came to steal but was surprised by the child...
- the abduction theory permits the widest investigation and means otherwise unable to justify, including bringing in teams from outside the Algarve, and all possible means are important in the first 72 hours. in peace and silence, the team can advance with a efficient and effective investigation avoiding suspicions on the family/friends while still collecting all necessary evidence to determine what happened
- 10am, 12 hours after the disappearance, the British Consul from Portimão arrives. PJ tell him all that is going on. He is not satisfied and is heard talking on the phone saying the "PJ are doing nothing. " Strange!
- And the information about the friends/family requested so urgently from the UK still hasn't arrived...
- one urgent question is whether or not M was the biological child of the McCanns, if not, this could be an abduction by the biological parents
- the urgent request still has not received a response from the UK... but here comes the Ambassador, from Lisbon [debk-3 hr drive]. This is not normal. Who is this couple? Who are these friends? We don't need diplomats, we need detailed responses to our questions, given urgently to the English-Portuguese liaison, Glen Power
- the searches continue, a helicoptor arrives, time is of the essence, highlighted by the fact that most of these witnesses are tourists who will return home on Saturday/tomorrow
- also concerns arise about M's parents and friends and their plans to return home; there is no way to legally oblige them to stay
- mid-morning, the Sub-National PJ Director arrives from Faro; he and GA go to the Ocean Club... to find all the journalists.
- M's disappearance has been presented by the friends in a much more coherent fashion to the media than to the police. (why?)
- GA and team are horrified to see one of the technicians collecting evidence without appropriate gear
- still, no signs of a breakin, no vestiges of an abductor, no finger prints from anyone outside the group, not even glove prints (from a possible abductor). there was a print found from one of the police, again, an error on their part
- collecting witness statements, team learns of a British man suspected of child abuse who is connected to a pub approx 150M from the OClub. in 2005, he was investigated and fled Portugal. But the pub is closed and the suspect has not been seen in the area. (later, the British confirm rumours that this man is in Iraq.)
- road works: the night of 3May the open road works were searched by GNR and dogs; they were re-inspected during the daylight of 4 May; the supervisor was spoken to and nothing unusual was discovered
TAPAS STATEMENTS AND FIRST INCONSISTENCIES (4 May)
- best to separate everyone and take all statements at once, important to question everyone, in case M's abduction were a mistake and one of the other children were the true target
- logistically, all can't be heard at once; someone has to stay with the children (debk - why not use the creche?)
- the morning of 4 May, only Gerry, Jane Tanner and Matthew Oldfield are interviewed... and inconsistencies already arise (Jane sees possible abductor; Gerry doesn't see abductor though he's there at the same time with Jeremiah); the rest of the group is interviewed the afternoon of 4 May, giving too much time for the others to learn the questions/answers of the first.
- translation slows things down, giving too much time to think
- the parents insist upon abduction and force this, and only this, idea
- Gerry says he left the front door locked and the apt was secure; Kate says she entered via the back door. She confirms that the bedroom window was wide upon and the blinds up.
The checking was defined as follows:
21h05 - GM checks, all is fine with the children 21h10/21h15- JT sees alleged abductor carrying child 21h30 - MO, enters apt 5A but not the bedroom, sees only the twins 22h00 - Kate raises alarm, M missing
- BUT if the window was wide open when MO checked, how did he not notice?
- MO says the bedroom door was half open, Kate says it was wide open
- Unexpectedly, other inconsistencies arise: Kate, when she talks about the person who allegedly took M, she refers to info that Jane has provided. Yet Kate describes someone completely different that Jane's person. (Jane = light trousers and shoulder length hair; Kate = long hair and jeans)
- Jane makes herself completely available and testifies several times
- to the police, Gerry says Jane told him, about midnight 4 May, that she saw an unknown individual, 30-40 yo, light trousers, dark hair, going up the street
- the GNR affirms that the parents immediately raised the abduction theory because Jane saw this man carrying a child; the GNR statements have this description: man, light trousers, 1,78m, dark shirt and carrying a child that appeared to be wearing pyjamas. Nothing else about the child, the pyjamas nor the man.
- by 11:30, 4 May, Jane gives another description, more detailed: a dark skinned man, 35-40yo, thin, 1,7m, dark, thick shoulderlength hair, linen pants of beige or gold color, a "Duffy" type jacket though not as thick, with classic black shoes: walking quickly and carrying a child laying across his two arms in front of his chest; by his dress, he didn't look like a tourist and didn't seem like a tourist because he was so bundled up ("encasacado"?). the child appeared to be sleeping, though she only saw the legs, the feet were bare and the pyjamas looked like cotton, a light color, maybe white or pink, with a design, perhaps, though she wasn't sure, perhaps with flowers.
- Jane says she would recognize the man from the back and by the way he walked. (later we'll understand the importance of this statement!)
- Jane's testimony surprised everyone. she says she didn't know what M was wearing. how could she not? 14 hrs had passed since the disappearance and Jane's version had been heard by many. Gerald even mentioned her testimony. but Jane says she only talked the Gerald without giving details, and only after she had talked to the police.
- but Kate had immediately, on the night of 3 May, given a description of what M was wearing. how could Jane, the next day, not know this when she talked to the police? everyone that night, who helped in the searches, was looking for a 3-4yo girl, barefoot, dressed in PJs with a top and light-colored bottoms, with a pink animal design. it's very surprising that Jane says she didn't have this information when she spoke to the police the next day, especially as she was making herself the most important witness in this phase of the investigation
FIRST SIGHTING/KATE'S REACTION - still 4 May, the parents are returning to Luz when a video is located at a gas station on the road from Lagos to Spain. A girl who looks like M is shown with two adults.. We ask the McCanns to return to Portimão, the afternoon is ending, we want to see if they can identify the girl in the video.
- Kate shows herself to be a bit irritated at being required to return to the police station and upset at the speed reached by the police car that was taking them back to Portimão. We were surprised that she showed no hope that her daughter might be recovered. (the video was not of M)
MORE POLICE - more police arrive from Lisbon; though not requested by GA, they are a big help. management is raised up a level within the police department. the efficacy of this is questioned later, and no reason is given for this move.
FIRST MEDIA COMMUNICATION - 4 May afternoon, authorization is requested to hold a press conference, in order to request information that might lead to M's recovery.
- 5 May, press release is done, M's foto released, along with contact info. Given the possibility of someone trying to alter her appearance, different hair lengths and styles are shown. Most responses are from psychics or people who dream about or have visions of Maddie. All are reviewed.
TANNER'S TESTIMONY WEAKENS - 20h00-22h00, 4 May, GA/team in Praia da Luz. It is obvious that there is very poor visibility in the area where Jane saw this possible abductor, undoubtedly making her detailed description difficult.
- Other witnesses say that on 3 May, in that area, at 21h58, there was no one around.
- The investigative teams continue to review Jane's statement: something doesn't make sense. Why would someone walk towards the most open area, even though there was not enough lighting to allow Jane to see anything in detail? A planned abduction would mean studying the area, the people. A car would have been parked away from the streetlights, in the opposite direction that Jane saw her abductor walking. Did she see someone going the opposite direction? If the abductor was using a car, he would have had to have driven through the center of Luz, passing in front of the parent's restaurant.... all options are reviewed. It's decided that the beach is the easiest place to reach for anyone who didn't have a car and did not know the area well.
- in the few bars, restaurants and cafés open at that time, no one saw anything unusual on the night of 3 May. (most closed at 21h00)
CRISIS ROOM/GROUP STATEMENTS IN DOUBT - all options remain open; opinions are divided, everything is open to discussion
- unanimous fact amongst the group: the back sliding door of 5A was closed but unlocked
- Gerry: says he entered by the front door with the key (why walk the long way around?), sees M for the last time. all the windows are closed. he says he could see the back door from the restaurant and that no one came in through it that night.
- Kate: enters at 22h00. See open window, raised blinds and curtains waving. (hard to believe, as the blinds don't open from the outside and Kate says the window was always closed).
- Both refuse to believe someone entered the back door because they could see it and no one could have entered without their detecting it. (it was then verified that they could NOT see the back door, given the hedge and the fact that they were sitting with their backs to their apartment)
- all of this -- everything closed, the children regularly checked, and this visual watching of the apartment's back door -- had the objective to proof the children were safe. nonetheless, it's obvious that M was not safe. If she had been, she wouldn't have disappeared.
- "too weird the idea to enter through a door and exit through the window with a four year old..." " knowing someone would arrive at any moment..." "these people are hiding something..." "some secret known and hidden by all... ?" "but these are doctors..." and so ends the first day
SATURDAY, 5 MAY (day 2) - an apartment for the police is filled with officer napping on couches, on the floor, shared beds. - in Luz, statements are still being collected from employees, nannies, residents and tourists - in Sagres, a tourist was taking fotos of children, including a blond, blue-eyed 4yo whose father snapped a foto of this man, who tried to grab her, as well as his car. the father wore dark glasses but said the "fotographer" was not dressed like a tourist, had dark brown hair covering his neck, creme trousers, classic shoes, out of place on the beach... we are reminded of Jane's statement.
- the rental agency IDs the car in the foto and the driver, a Polish man, approx 40 yo, with his wife, arriving in Portugal on 28 April, via Berlin to Faro, stayed in a rented apt in Budens, near Praia da Luz. They left Portugal on the 7am flight, 5 May. Interpol and the German police act quickly. They talk to passengers on the flight but no one saw a child like Madeleine. The Polish man takes a train to Poland. No one checks his fotos. The lead dies here... though he certainly doesn't have anything to do with this case, the lead was incomplete.
- information comes in: white vans, strange people on the beach, a group of gypsies, etc. all are tracked, all lead to nothing. more than 400 homes are searched.
- McCanns and twins are in the Payne's apartment. we talk about going to the apt to collect M's clothes, especially those she was wearing the afternoon of 3 May when taken from the creche, to see if there is any sign of violence. The British Ambassador is already meeting with the investigators. The decision is to NOT request M's clothes, to avoid a media rush, it is "premature" to consider the parents suspects.
- Suddenly the parents and firends must be treated with diplomacy, we are not allowed to question their behaviour. The strategy is that all theories are open. Somehow Jane's statement gains weight such that the first press communication is that this is considered an abduction. The media demands were enormous, something had to be said.
HANDLING THE PRESS/ McCANN'S SPOKESPEOPLE - PJ requested a spokesperson right away...
- We think the investigators should remove themselves from the media. However, the PJ should have people who analyze the news, in this case watching what the parents and friends were saying. But that didn't happen and we felt the lack of that resource.
- media explosion, never before had Portugal seen such a media preoccupation by the parent's of a missing child
- fact: there was an immediate and ever growing preoccupation by the McCanns with the management of media communicaionts. An analysis of the images of the couple, and in their many TV interviews, one sees that this image management is a priority
CELLPHONE USAGE - all lines of investigation continue open, still locating known pedofiles in the Algarve, resident or tourists. Witness statements arrive and are analyzed, especially those of OClub employees and telefone records that were provided.
- very obvious that telefone records for 3 May are required. the 5A apt coordinates are defined and details of all calls received/sent from local antenas are requested. (movements can be tracked with cellfones)
- on 4 May, the parents authorized the police to look at their cellfones to check for calls made and received:
Kate's fone: no calls made from 27April to 4 May; she received no calls from 11h22 on 2 May until 23h17 on 3 May
Gerry's fone: nothing prior to 00h15 on 4 May
However, inside Kate's fone there is a record of a call received from Gerry at 11h17, 3 May. But no record of the call on Gerry's fone. It had been erased.
It was later verified that the first calls began about an hour after Kate raised the alarm, which could be very understandable given the searching that was being done.
23h00, 5 May - 3h00, 6 May ==================== - meeting of entire investigative team. some are upset with the PJ press release, others with the presence of the UK Ambassador (does he attend to all cases of British children? Why this one? Only the UK can respond to question)
- suggestion made to wiretap and follow the parents and friends: the statements don't work, the window story doesn't make sense and Jane's statement is ever weaker... they could be removed from suspicion this way and it should be done in case of a ransom request... but a judicial authorization is required
- mid-meeting GA receives notice, still unknown whether or not it was true, that the British secret service had begun wiretapping the McCanns and friends. If true, the results never were delivered to PJ.
SUNDAY, 6 MAY (day 3) - The day begins poorly: Polish police misunderstood the request and merely questioned the "photographer" and ascertained he did not have Madeleine. they did not look at his fotos. (could be a lost lead for a pedo ring... ) nonetheless, CCTV images are found of the couple in a mall in Lisbon [3 hours north] and shown around Praia da Luz. Nothing. The rental car has already been re-rented but the litter removed from it is found and searched. Nothing. The apartment is thoroughly examined. Nothing connects to Madeleine.
- information about strange behaviours and strange people near OClub continue to flow into the crisis room...
|